Re: What's size of your PostgreSQL Database?

From: Ow Mun Heng <Ow(dot)Mun(dot)Heng(at)wdc(dot)com>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amber <guxiaobo1982(at)hotmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What's size of your PostgreSQL Database?
Date: 2008-08-18 09:43:45
Message-ID: 1219052625.16249.66.camel@neuromancer.home.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
>If you throw enough drives on a quality RAID controller at it you can
>get very good throughput. If you're looking at read only / read
>mostly, then RAID5 or 6 might be a better choice than RAID-10. But
>RAID 10 is my default choice unless testing shows RAID-5/6 can beat
>it.

I'm loading my slave server with RAID-0 based on 3 IDE 7200 Drives.
Is this worst off than a RAID 5 implementation?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joao Ferreira gmail 2008-08-18 10:09:12 failed to re-find parent key in "..."
Previous Message Tomasz Ostrowski 2008-08-18 09:28:11 Re: Experiences with BLOB + PostgreSQL