Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)hobby(dot)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)hobby(dot)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)hobby(dot)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)hobby(dot)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Yeb Havinga <yeb(dot)havinga(at)portavita(dot)nl>
Subject: Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner?
Date: 2014-04-15 02:15:25
Message-ID: 12181.1397528125@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> I've uploaded the latest patch, rebased against master, with my changes
> to here: http://snowman.net/~sfrost/rls_ringerc_sf.patch.gz as I don't
> believe it'd clear the mailing list (it's 29k).

Please actually post it, for the archives' sake. 29k is far below the
list limit. (Which I don't know exactly what it is ... but certainly
in the hundreds of KB.)

> I'll take a look at changing the cache key to include user ID and
> ripping out the plan invalidation logic from the current patch tomorrow
> but I seriously doubt I'll be able to get all of that done in the next
> day or two.

TBH I think we are up against the deadline. April 15 was the agreed-to
drop dead date for pushing new features into 9.4.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-04-15 02:17:37 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add TAP tests for client programs
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2014-04-15 02:11:01 Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages?