Re: plan invalidation vs stored procedures

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Asko Oja <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
Date: 2008-08-06 12:20:14
Message-ID: 1218025214.9188.22.camel@huvostro
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 12:13 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2008/8/6 Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>:
> > On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 16:17 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
..
> >> you cannot change header of function. It's same as change C header of
> >> function without complete recompilation.
> >
> > SQL is not C.
> >
> > You don't have to recompile the whole SQL database when you add columns
> > to tables, so why should you need to do it, when you add a column to
> > table-returning function ?
> >
>
> I thing, it's possible - but it's neccessary completly new dictionary
> with dependencies (some dependencies are dynamic - polymorphic
> functions) so it's dificult task.

I think that you can safely err on the side of caution, that is, save
more dependendcies than actually affected.

Or you even add dependencies from inside the pl, either at compile/check
or run time (cached of course), so that you hit the exact right function
oid and can reuse the function lookup already done.

-----------------
Hannu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit jain 2008-08-06 12:36:09 pg_restore -d cipa /cipa/RAJASTHAN/RAJASTHAN/CIPABACKUP01_08_2008.TAR pg_restore: [archiver] out of memory
Previous Message Nikolae Shevchenco (md) 2008-08-06 10:49:45 Re: unable to build libpq on Win 2003 (32 bit)