Isn't hash indexing implementation non-WAL ?
Alex.
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 13:16 -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:07:18 -0700
> Alex Vinogradovs <AVinogradovs(at)Clearpathnet(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > By loading in bulks, I mean I load some 40-50 thousand
> > rows at once into a table that already has some millions.
> > Index rebuild on that table after each 50k inserts will
> > be even less efficient ;)
>
> Fair enough, to answer your question, "no". We don't have any non wal
> table tables or index types.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake