From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Hint Bits and Write I/O |
Date: | 2008-07-21 20:08:11 |
Message-ID: | 1216670891.3894.34.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 11:36 +0530, Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> I think we should try at least one or two possible optimizations and
> get some numbers before we jump and make substantial changes to the
> code.
You know you're suggesting months of tests and further discussion. :-(
I'll fix the bug, but I'm not doing any more on this now till feature
freeze. It's the wrong time to chase mirages.
Thanks for checking my logic.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2008-07-21 20:14:06 | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-21 20:07:34 | Re: [patch] plproxy v2 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-21 20:16:13 | Re: page macros cleanup (ver 04) |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-07-21 19:26:38 | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance |