| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Windows + IP6 progress |
| Date: | 2005-08-18 22:46:44 |
| Message-ID: | 12161.1124405204@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> . what do we do about the getaddrinfo test? I'm almost inclined not to
> do it on windows, and assume that if we have ws2_32.dll we have it.
There's something mighty fishy about that. AC_REPLACE_FUNCS works on
Windows for the other cases it's used for (no?), so what's different
about getaddrinfo? Perhaps Microsoft has #define'd that name as
something else, or some equally ugly crock? It'd be useful to look into
their header files and see exactly how and where getaddrinfo is
declared.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-18 22:59:09 | Re: Found: some pretty ugly VACUUM bugs |
| Previous Message | Paul Tillotson | 2005-08-18 22:41:47 | t_ctid chains |