From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: variadic function support |
Date: | 2008-07-13 06:06:04 |
Message-ID: | 1215929164.11352.55.camel@jdavis |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 17:10 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hello
>
> this version implements syntax based on argmodes.
>
>
> CREATE FUNCTION mleast(variadic numeric[]) RETURNS numeric AS $$
> SELECT min($1[i])
> FROM generate_subscripts($1,1) g(i);
> $$ LANGUAGE SQL;
>
I don't have a strong opinion about whether the variadic argument is
declared as an array or scalar, so I am posting my comments about this
version of the patch as well.
This version also has a problem when declaring two functions "foo(int)"
and "foo(variadic int[])". In this version, the declaration is allowed
but the backend crashes when the function is called.
The variable "transform_variadic" should have some kind of comment. It
seems to be there to distinguish between when you're looking for a
candidate function for a function call, and when you're looking for a
candidate function for, e.g., CREATE FUNCTION. It's a little hard to
follow, and is probably the cause for the aformentioned crash.
Also, it doesn't seem to allow calls to a variadic function with zero
arguments, e.g. "mleast()". I think this should be allowed.
I suggest the following error message rewording:
"variadic argument isn't an array" should be something like: "variadic
argument must be an array".
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2008-07-13 06:11:56 | Re: variadic function support |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2008-07-13 05:52:11 | Re: variadic function support |