| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, lists(at)stringsutils(dot)com, Pgsql General list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Default fill factor for tables? |
| Date: | 2008-07-11 21:24:01 |
| Message-ID: | 1215811441.4051.1664.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 14:51 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> I would kindly disagree. I'm looking at a project where HOT updates
> are going to be a real performance enhancement, but I'll have to
> create a hundred or so tables ALL with fillfactor tacked on the end.
You clearly think that adjusting fillfactor helps in all cases with HOT.
I disagree with that, else would have pushed earlier for exactly what
you suggest. In fact, I've has this exact discussion previously.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-07-11 21:25:29 | Re: Default fill factor for tables? |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-07-11 21:08:54 | Re: How do I tell if a vacuum is currently running? |