Re: No answers on CommitFest procedures?

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: No answers on CommitFest procedures?
Date: 2008-07-09 18:42:54
Message-ID: 1215628974.11418.28.camel@goldbach
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 14:38 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> But patches in progress still need comments from reviewers.

Certainly, but should this be done as part of the commit fest process?
Commenting on the future direction that an in-development patch ought to
take sounds more like a task for -hackers at large, rather than for an
individual reviewer.

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2008-07-09 18:45:24 Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-07-09 18:38:54 Re: No answers on CommitFest procedures?