From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Userset logging |
Date: | 2008-07-08 07:36:21 |
Message-ID: | 1215502581.4051.674.camel@ebony.site |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:13 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I notice log_temp_files is a PGC_USERSET parameter, which is out of step
> with our current thinking on who is allowed to initiate logging.
>
> Is there a rationale for this? Or should we set this to PGC_SUSET like
> all the other logging functions?
Patch enclosed.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
log_temp_files_suset.v1.patch | text/x-patch | 924 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2008-07-08 08:22:32 | Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2008-07-08 07:26:42 | Re: CommitFest rules |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2008-07-08 09:01:05 | Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP |
Previous Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2008-07-08 01:29:04 | Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements |