| From: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gauri Kanekar <meetgaurikanekar(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Hot Issue |
| Date: | 2008-07-02 13:08:04 |
| Message-ID: | 1215004084.2842.32.camel@laptop.gunduz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 18:01 +0530, Gauri Kanekar wrote:
> Checked out the performance of Hot on 30th June :
>
> relname n_tup_ins n_tup_upd n_tup_del
> n_tup_hot_upd
> n_live_tup n_dead_tup *table1* *15509156* *2884653* *0* *2442823*
> *
> 15509158* *68046* table2 434585 718472 0 642336 434703 16723 table3
> 105546
> 252143 0 233078 105402 4922
<snip>
>
> Checked the performance of Hot on 2nd July :
>
> relname n_tup_ins n_tup_upd n_tup_del
> n_tup_hot_upd
> n_live_tup n_dead_tup *table1**15577724* *6237242* *0* *2924948*
> *
> 18460676* *131103* table2 435558 1579613 0 763397 1171497 42476
Maybe those updates were not qualified for HOT between these days?
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gauri Kanekar | 2008-07-02 13:11:38 | Re: Hot Issue |
| Previous Message | Gauri Kanekar | 2008-07-02 12:41:43 | Re: Hot Issue |