| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "Peter T(dot) Breuer" <ptb(at)inv(dot)it(dot)uc3m(dot)es>, Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Hardware vs Software RAID |
| Date: | 2008-06-25 15:35:28 |
| Message-ID: | 1214408128.28228.1.camel@jd-laptop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 11:30 -0400, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> wrote:
> > SMART doesn't detect 100% of drive failures in advance, but you'd be silly
> > to setup a database system where you don't get to take advantage of the
> > ~50% it does catch before you lose any data.
>
> Can't argue with that one.
SMART has certainly saved our butts more than once.
Joshua D. Drake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthew Wakeling | 2008-06-25 15:35:37 | Re: Hardware vs Software RAID |
| Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2008-06-25 15:30:14 | Re: Hardware vs Software RAID |