| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Seth Grimes <grimes(at)altaplana(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL derivatives |
| Date: | 2008-06-07 00:14:11 |
| Message-ID: | 1212797651.14299.7.camel@jd-laptop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 19:58 -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Friday 06 June 2008 18:32:23 Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> > We make closed-source changes related to the Postgres core related to
> > performance and Oracle compatibility. But, while these changes are
> > fairly significant, they do not prevent us from laying over a newer
> > version of Postgres. Similarly, as you mentioned, GridSQL is fully
> > open source.
> >
>
> Note that GridSQL, while it works with postgres, was developed completely
> seperate and independently from postgresql.
Well GridSQL isn't even an extension to PostgreSQL is it? It is written
in java and appears to be a userland application (or middleware if you
prefer). I could be wrong.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2008-06-07 03:23:56 | Re: PostgreSQL derivatives |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2008-06-06 23:58:39 | Re: PostgreSQL derivatives |