Re: PostgreSQL derivatives

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Seth Grimes <grimes(at)altaplana(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL derivatives
Date: 2008-06-05 23:49:19
Message-ID: 1212709759.12052.503.camel@jd-laptop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 18:36 -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Robert Treat wrote:
> e best terminology to describe the distinction.
>
> > And actually, I don't know of any contributions they have made directly
> > to the community.
>
> Don't make me start one of those discussions about how there are a lot of
> way to directly contribute to the community besides straight code writing.
> If we start it will get Joshua all worked up about that again.

I actually consider the Truviso contribution direct to the community.
Its just that CMD was paid to do it. This isn't really any different
than the work Alvaro did on multi-vacuum workers. CMD didn't "directly"
do the work, we paid a human to do that, Alvaro.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2008-06-06 15:10:34 Re: PostgreSQL derivatives
Previous Message Greg Smith 2008-06-05 22:36:39 Re: PostgreSQL derivatives