Re: RFC: Product directory

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, w^3 <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Product directory
Date: 2008-06-02 15:56:34
Message-ID: 1212422194.12052.37.camel@jd-laptop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 16:46 +0100, Dave Page wrote:

> > I have to go with fetter here. Pricing is not our concern.
>
> I actually feel quite strongly about that one - it's not *our*
> concern, but it is the concern of the users. There's nothing worse
> than researching a product, and eventually finding out after trawling
> the website for half an hour that it's way too expensive. As an
> end-user I always wanted to see a ballpark figure up front.

And who is going to make sure the pricing is up to date? (hint: no one
will)

> > Yeah I mentioned this in my previous post. Publisher really needs to be
> > pushed out. There is entirely too much redundant information that can be
> > accumulated.
>
> OK so the difficulty here/previously is that you are essentially
> saying I need to write a publisher management system and a product
> management system, and update sponsors, news, events, services etc to
> use that data as well. Nice in theory, but not something I have time
> to do.

But I am sure you have time to create a secondary table and the code for
it. I am not asking you to create all the code for sponsors, news,
events. I am asking you to use a reusable design so others can create
code for those services.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2008-06-02 16:02:23 Re: RFC: Product directory
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2008-06-02 15:48:49 Re: RFC: Product directory