Re: Wierd query behaviour

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Wierd query behaviour
Date: 2002-04-26 22:43:41
Message-ID: 12113.1019861021@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

"Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> UPDATE cases SET status = 99
> WHERE status = 1 AND NOT EXISTS(
> SELECT case_id FROM case_clients
> WHERE date_resolved IS NULL OR
> date_resolved > ((current_date - "interval"('1 year'))::DATE)
> and case_clients.case_id = cases.case_id);

It says here that OR binds at lower priority than AND. Did you really
mean

... WHERE (date_resolved IS NULL OR
date_resolved > ((current_date - "interval"('1 year'))::DATE))
and case_clients.case_id = cases.case_id);

Since IS NULL isn't indexable, the first version cannot be indexscanned
at all. The second version gives you a shot at using the
case_clients.case_id index.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-04-26 22:54:26 Re: Function won't complete
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2002-04-26 21:57:20 Function won't complete