From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: notification information functions |
Date: | 2008-05-19 07:46:18 |
Message-ID: | 1211183178.8174.7.camel@huvostro |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 16:00 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I am working on moving the notification buffer into shared memory as
> previously discussed. Since pg_listener will no longer exist, I think we
> need to provide a couple of information functions.
>
> I suggest:
>
> pg_listened_events(out event name) returns setof record
> pg_pending_events(out event name, out message text) returns setof record
>
> The first would show events being listened on by the current backend,
> while the second would show all pending events for the current db.
>
> Given that there will no longer be any central place where events will
> be registered to be listened on, it will not be possible to show all
> such events for the current db.
Are you sure that there will be no central place ?
How will we know then that all listeners have received their events ?
------------------
Hannu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2008-05-19 08:40:15 | Re: What in the world is happening on spoonbill? |
Previous Message | Zoltan Boszormenyi | 2008-05-19 06:19:17 | Re: WITH RECURSIVE patch V0.1 |