Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 08/11/2010 04:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I prefer the change-the-default approach mainly because it wouldn't
>> require any documentation,
> Yeah. The other advantage is that we would not need to wait until we had
> got everyone to update their versions of the buildfarm code.
Um. That's actually a pretty darn strong point, considering how
slow some buildfarm owners are to update the script :-(
regards, tom lane