| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A user report of misinterpretation of 'unsupported versions' |
| Date: | 2013-07-13 00:44:07 |
| Message-ID: | 1211.1373676247@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> But I can understand the confusion - do you have a suggestion for how
>> to write it to make it more obvious what the actual problem is?
> I don't think I communicated the problem right.
Yeah, you did, but we need a concrete suggestion as to how to improve
the wording.
I wonder if just adding "in" would help:
This page in other versions: 9.2 / 9.1 / 9.0 / 8.4 | In unsupported versions: 9.3 / 8.3 / 8.2 / 8.1 / 8.0 / 7.4 / 7.3 / 7.2 / devel
Another possibility is to replace "unsupported" with something more
explicit:
This page in other versions: 9.2 / 9.1 / 9.0 / 8.4 | Unreleased or obsolete versions: 9.3 / 8.3 / 8.2 / 8.1 / 8.0 / 7.4 / 7.3 / 7.2 / devel
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Farina | 2013-07-13 01:12:03 | Re: A user report of misinterpretation of 'unsupported versions' |
| Previous Message | Daniel Farina | 2013-07-12 18:31:42 | Re: A user report of misinterpretation of 'unsupported versions' |