On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 14:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think storage parameter is no good also, given the current design that
> assumes those can be changed on-the-fly. It'd be okay to GIT-ify an
> existing index, perhaps, but not the other way round.
>
> I was considering a new pg_index column. Or else we'd have to fix
> the storage-parameter infrastructure to support restricting changes
> of some parameters.
The latter seems best, since we're likely to need to do it anyway one
day.
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com