From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: sslinfo contrib module - |
Date: | 2006-09-04 20:29:19 |
Message-ID: | 12081.1157401759@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Also, the code is released under BSD license, so why is it important if
> it says "Copyright Foo, Inc" or something else?
Because every so often we get pestered by lawyers who get worried when
there's a collection of random different copyright notices in the code.
Actually, I don't think there's anything wrong with "Copyright Foo Inc"
as long as there's also a statement "Released under the PostgreSQL
license" or equivalent. The problem here was that with neither that nor
a "copyright assignment", there is no clear intent to make the code
available under our license terms.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-04 20:31:02 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: sslinfo contrib module - |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-09-04 20:20:45 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: sslinfo contrib module - |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-04 20:31:02 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: sslinfo contrib module - |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-09-04 20:20:45 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: sslinfo contrib module - |