From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Manfred Spraul <manfred(at)colorfullife(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: fix for strict-alias warnings |
Date: | 2003-10-14 19:52:42 |
Message-ID: | 12081.1066161162@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> OK, what gcc versions support -fno-strict-aliasing? Do we need a
> configure test for it?
Perhaps ... although it is recognized in 2.95.3 and probably for a good
ways before that.
It looks to me like what has changed in gcc 3.3 is not the existence
of the flag, but the fact that -O2 now turns it on where it did not
before.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jon Jensen | 2003-10-14 19:52:55 | Re: postgres --help-config |
Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-10-14 19:39:17 | Re: pg_ctl reload - is it safe? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-14 20:01:32 | Re: fix for strict-alias warnings |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-14 19:37:28 | Re: fix for strict-alias warnings |