| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |
| Date: | 2016-10-03 20:03:31 |
| Message-ID: | 12076.1475525011@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2016-10-03 21:54 GMT+02:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Personally I'm on the edge of washing my hands of the whole thing...
>> The hand-washing strategy has a lot to recommend it; this thread is
>> going nowhere fast. I don't care enough to put up a big stink about
>> the idea of removing PL source code from \df+ output, but it's not
>> what I'd choose to do; let's call me -0 on that option.
> I can write the patch - I am sure so cleaned \df+ output will be better
> than what we have now.
Writing a patch is not the problem. Getting consensus on what it should
do is the problem.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | otar shavadze | 2016-10-03 20:16:36 | Re: [GENERAL] Understanding “max_wal_size” and “min_wal_size” parameters default values from postgresql.conf file |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2016-10-03 20:00:16 | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |