From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Keaton Adams <kadams(at)mxlogic(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Replication with read-only access to standby DB |
Date: | 2008-03-25 22:08:44 |
Message-ID: | 1206482924.4285.1077.camel@ebony.site |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 14:11 -0600, Keaton Adams wrote:
> “Oracle Active Data Guard enables a physical standby database to be
> open for read-only access – for reporting, simple or complex queries –
> while changes from the production database are being applied to it.
> This means any operation that requires up-to-date read-only access can
> be offloaded to the replica, enhancing and protecting the performance
> of the production database.”
>
> “All queries reading from the physical replica execute in real-time,
> and return current results. A Data Guard configuration consists of
> one production (or primary) database and up to nine standby
> databases. A standby database is initially created from a backup copy
> of the primary database. Once created, Data Guard automatically
> maintains the standby database as a synchronized copy of the primary
> database by transmitting primary database redo data to the standby
> system and then applying the redo data to the standby database.”
>
> Does anyone know of such a solution for PostgreSQL?
Some funding would help that move forwards. If you or others would
consider that, it would help, even if just to provide the seed for
additional contributors.
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Broersma | 2008-03-25 22:32:57 | Re: PostgreSQL Replication with read-only access to standby DB |
Previous Message | Malinka Rellikwodahs | 2008-03-25 21:37:00 | Re: select any table |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-03-25 22:32:05 | Re: advancing snapshot's xmin |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-03-25 22:03:39 | Re: gcc 4.3 breaks ContribCheck in 8.2 and older. |