Re: long transaction

From: Lennin Caro <lennin(dot)caro(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, Sabin Coanda <sabin(dot)coanda(at)deuromedia(dot)ro>
Subject: Re: long transaction
Date: 2008-07-18 17:22:59
Message-ID: 120621.32315.qm@web59503.mail.ac4.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

have you use VACUMM?

--- On Fri, 7/18/08, Sabin Coanda <sabin(dot)coanda(at)deuromedia(dot)ro> wrote:

> From: Sabin Coanda <sabin(dot)coanda(at)deuromedia(dot)ro>
> Subject: [PERFORM] long transaction
> To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Date: Friday, July 18, 2008, 3:34 PM
> Hi there,
>
> I have a script which includes 30000 called functions
> within a single
> transaction.
>
> At the beginning, the functions runs fast enough (about 60
> ms each). In
> time, it begins to run slower and slower (at final about
> one per 2 seconds).
>
> I check the functions that runs slowly outside the script
> and they run
> normally (60 ms each).
>
> What is the problem ?
>
> TIA,
> Sabin
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list
> (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig James 2008-07-18 17:40:33 Re: Mailing list hacked by spammer?
Previous Message Glyn Astill 2008-07-18 16:37:54 Re: Mailing list hacked by spammer?