Re: forcing use of more indexes (bitmap AND)

From: Ow Mun Heng <Ow(dot)Mun(dot)Heng(at)wdc(dot)com>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: forcing use of more indexes (bitmap AND)
Date: 2008-03-14 06:58:00
Message-ID: 1205477880.354.31.camel@neuromancer.home.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 00:50 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Ow Mun Heng <Ow(dot)Mun(dot)Heng(at)wdc(dot)com> wrote:
> > query is something like this
> >
> > Select *
> > from v_test
> > where acode Like 'PC%'
> > and rev = '0Q'
> > and hcm = '1'
> > and mcm = 'K'
> >
> > where acode, rev, hcm, mcm are all indexes.
> >
> > Currently this query is only using the rev and mcm for the bitmapAND.
> > it then does a bitmap heap scan using the acode and the hcm indexes.
> >
> > I would like to try to see if forcing the planner to favour heavier usage of the indexes would yield faster results.
> >
> > I've tried lowering
>
> Would setting enable_bitmapscan=off do that? I'm not being sarcastic,
> I really don't know.

This is even worst as the planner would only use 1 index.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ow Mun Heng 2008-03-14 07:06:56 Re: forcing use of more indexes (bitmap AND)
Previous Message Aarni Ruuhimäki 2008-03-14 06:56:10 Re: postgre vs MySQL