From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Support for XLogRecPtr in expand_fmt_string? |
Date: | 2012-07-03 18:52:51 |
Message-ID: | 12050.1341341571@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On tis, 2012-07-03 at 19:35 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
>> I wonder if we just should add a format code like %R or something similar as a
>> replacement for the %X/%X notion.
> Maybe just print it as a single 64-bit value from now on.
That'd be problematic also, because of the lack of standardization of
the format code for uint64. We could write things like
"message... " UINT64_FORMAT " ...more message"
but I wonder how well the translation tools would work with that;
and anyway it would at least double the translation effort for
messages containing such things.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2012-07-03 18:59:00 | Re: Support for XLogRecPtr in expand_fmt_string? |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-07-03 18:45:51 | Re: Support for XLogRecPtr in expand_fmt_string? |