| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade and missing loadable libraries |
| Date: | 2017-06-04 18:04:37 |
| Message-ID: | 12037.1496599477@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> The problem is that in some cases extensions are improperly removed or
> the extension has bugs that leaves pg_proc entries around that aren't
> dumped, but are seen by pg_upgrade and generate an error. In these
> cases, and I have seen a few recently, we don't give the user any way to
> find the cause except ask for assistance, i.e. we don't show them the
> query we used to find the problem libraries.
Meh. I think that sort of situation is one in which non-experts are
going to need help in any case. It's unlikely that pg_upgrade can,
or should try to, offer them advice sufficient to fix the problem.
Also, I completely reject the idea that pg_upgrade's output should
be optimized for that situation rather than the typical "you forgot
to install these extensions in the new installation" case.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2017-06-04 18:16:32 | Re: pg_upgrade and missing loadable libraries |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2017-06-04 17:59:09 | Re: pg_upgrade and missing loadable libraries |