| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: idle connection timeout ... |
| Date: | 2002-10-25 20:17:46 |
| Message-ID: | 12035.1035577066@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> writes:
> [ extensive proposal for PROFILEs ]
> It seems like a nice project, particularly since it wouldn't
> affect anyone that doesn't want to use it.
... except in the added overhead to do the resource accounting and check
to see if there is a restriction ...
> And whenever a new
> resource limitation issue arrises, such as PL/SQL recursion
> depth, a new attribute would be added to pg_profile to handle
> the limitation...
I prefer GUC variables to table entries for setting stuff like recursion
limits; they're much lighter-weight to create and access, and you don't
need an initdb to add or remove a parameter.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-25 20:18:22 | Time for RC1 soon? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-25 19:54:27 | Re: idle connection timeout ... |