From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Sadeq Dousti <msdousti(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: psql \dh: List High-Level (Root) Tables and Indexes |
Date: | 2025-02-23 21:38:59 |
Message-ID: | 1202972.1740346739@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Sadeq Dousti <msdousti(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> "High-level" is not terminology we use anywhere else
>> We do use the terms "root partition" or "partition root".
> I agree "high-level" is not standard, but "root partition" also entails
> the table is actually partitioned. This is not necessarily the case.
> The suggested command will show all non-partitioned tables, plus the
> root partitions.
Hmm, that seems even less derivable from the term "high-level"
than what I thought you meant. However, if that's the behavior
you want, maybe we could extend "\d[ti...]" with an option that
suppresses partition-tree members? My first thought about that
is "n" for "not a partition member", but maybe somebody else
can invent a better name. (One problem with "n" is that "\dn"
without either "t" or "i" would mean something else. Using "N"
would fix that, but the capitalization seems a bit random.)
Independently of that, extending \dP with an option for "roots
only" seems like a good idea. But that's a different patch.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrei Lepikhov | 2025-02-23 22:12:36 | Re: Removing unneeded self joins |
Previous Message | Sadeq Dousti | 2025-02-23 21:34:30 | Re: psql \dh: List High-Level (Root) Tables and Indexes |