| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL - JDBC <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: JDBC, prepared queries, and partitioning |
| Date: | 2008-02-13 22:04:43 |
| Message-ID: | 1202940283.16770.525.camel@ebony.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 16:41 -0500, Kris Jurka wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> > OK, but AFAICS the docs relating to prepareThreshold are wrong. They
> > describe behaviour that doesn't happen all of the time, yet there is
> > nothing to indicate that.
>
> That's spelled out in detail if you follow the link:
>
> http://jdbc.postgresql.org/documentation/83/server-prepare.html
I'd read it before and again before I posted this evening. Which part of
that says prepareTheshold only applies to v2 protocol?
The code example doesn't explicitly state protocolVersion as you say is
required either.
> > Happy to provide a patch, if you'd like.
> If you think it's important, go ahead.
You don't think its important?
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Denne | 2008-02-13 22:10:56 | Re: JDBC, prepared queries, and partitioning |
| Previous Message | Stephen Denne | 2008-02-13 22:00:26 | Re: JDBC, prepared queries, and partitioning |