From: | Koen Vermeer <koen(at)vermeer(dot)tv> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Storing images as BYTEA or large objects |
Date: | 2008-02-13 08:48:44 |
Message-ID: | 1202892524.5251.10.camel@localhost |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 21:14 -0600, Andy Colson wrote:
> Having used the large objects, I can tell you they do backup (pg_dump,
> etc) and they are not hard to use. There is even a contrib that helps
> you hook them up to a table so they get deleted/etc at appropriate times
> (I have not used it though so not sure 100%) (they were easy enough to
> use even without the contrib).
In my case, I do not really worry about cleaning them up, as I expect
not to delete the objects (or only very rarely) anyway. But it's good to
know (I hope I still remember it in a few months) that there is a
contrib that handles this.
> The only reason I used lo was to avoid the escaping. I'm not sure how
> slow escaping a 20 meg file would be, but it just sounded slow. And you
> have to do it twice, once to send it, and once when you get it back.
I thought about that too, and didn't find conclusive arguments to choose
one or the other. So I decided to just ask, but the jury is still out...
Best,
Koen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gevik Babakhani | 2008-02-13 08:57:49 | Re: Storing images as BYTEA or large objects |
Previous Message | Koen Vermeer | 2008-02-13 08:43:01 | Re: Storing images as BYTEA or large objects |