From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert(dot)Farrugia(at)go(dot)com(dot)mt |
Cc: | Denis Pugnere <Denis(dot)Pugnere(at)igh(dot)cnrs(dot)fr>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: Kernel panic error |
Date: | 2001-02-16 16:07:10 |
Message-ID: | 12028.982339630@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
Robert(dot)Farrugia(at)go(dot)com(dot)mt writes:
> What showed up was the "Error index_formtuple: data takes 21268 bytes: too
> big". If anyone has any ideas on this, please share them.
That says that you have a value too wide to fit in an index entry. If
it was from data that fit before, then I think this must indicate that
data on-disk has gotten corrupted, causing some datum to appear longer
than it was --- and then when vacuum tries to rebuild the index entry
for that row, you get a failure.
In any case I'd say this is a consequence of your kernel-level problem.
It cannot be the cause.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-02-16 16:12:00 | Re: Re: Kernel panic error |
Previous Message | Robert.Farrugia | 2001-02-16 08:00:49 | Re: Kernel panic error |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-02-16 16:12:00 | Re: Re: Kernel panic error |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-02-16 14:42:31 | Re: MATCH PARTIAL |