Re: configurability of OOM killer

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Markus Bertheau <mbertheau(dot)pg(at)googlemail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: configurability of OOM killer
Date: 2008-02-08 06:42:07
Message-ID: 1202452927.4247.44.camel@ebony.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 08:45 +0600, Markus Bertheau wrote:

> What about allowing shared_buffers to be only greater than it was at
> server start and allocating the extra shared_buffers in one or more
> additional shm segments?

Sounds possible.

--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-02-08 06:43:47 Re: configurability of OOM killer
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-02-08 06:40:40 Re: configurability of OOM killer