| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: configurability of OOM killer |
| Date: | 2008-02-04 22:00:23 |
| Message-ID: | 1202162423.4252.610.camel@ebony.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 13:40 -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
> Did you read my post on LKML?
Nice post, BTW. I think you should just submit a patch. There was a
similar problem sometime recently with counting mapped files incorrectly
towards the dirty ratio, so your issue has both clear error and
similar-ish precedent.
My comments are slightly tangential, but nonetheless relevant. I don't
think we will be listened to if we have unresolved issues in that area,
if you say you are from PGDG and want it fixed.
Maybe if I said nothing, it would help with LKML, but I say what I see.
Find me a person that thinks our memory management is easy to tune in
comparison to other DBMS.
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2008-02-04 22:01:44 | Re: configurability of OOM killer |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2008-02-04 21:52:50 | Re: configurability of OOM killer |