From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
Cc: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Will PostgreSQL get ported to CUDA? |
Date: | 2008-01-31 10:21:20 |
Message-ID: | 1201774880.7105.10.camel@huvostro |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 12:56 -0800, Dann Corbit wrote:
> It's too bad that they have a restrictive license.
>
> Perhaps there is an opportunity to create an "information appliance"
> that contains a special build of PostgreSQL, a nice heap of super-speedy
> disk, and a big pile of GPUs for sort and merge type operations. The
> thing that seems nice to me about this idea is that you would have a
> very stable test platform (all hardware and software combinations would
> be known and thoroughly tested) and you might also get some extreme
> performance.
>
> I guess that a better sort than GPUSort could be written from scratch,
> but legal entanglements with the use of the graphics cards may make the
> whole concept DOA.
Maybe some physics engines are also wort a look.
Soemthing like:
http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/05/04/review_ageia_physx_board/
could suit some DB tasks better than GPU
-------------
Hannu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-01-31 10:22:42 | Re: Truncate Triggers |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-01-31 09:50:28 | Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died |