From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>, General postgres mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WARNINGs after starting backup server created with PITR |
Date: | 2008-01-19 08:26:37 |
Message-ID: | 1200731197.4255.415.camel@ebony.site |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 19:58 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> In any case, 125 different zeroed pages is pretty hard to explain
> by such a mechanism (especially if they were scattered rather than
> in contiguous clumps).
Can you show us the messages, so we can understand the distribution of
the pages?
Are there different numbers of rows in the two tables? Just a select
count(*) might do, but any way you have of verifying data between the
two systems would be very useful.
The page numbers are identical between both systems, so use the
contrib/pageinspect get_raw_page() function to record the contents on
both systems before they diverge too much. (BTW, the final commit of
those tools seems to have removed the docs I wrote for the original
version and haven't been replaced with a README -- huh!?).
create table bad_blocks as select <blockid> as blockid,
get_raw_page(<relname>, <blockid>)::bytea as raw_page;
I've got a bad feeling about rsync. Mason's recent problems used rsync
and so far they are not properly explained, except as a hardware
problem.
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannes Dorbath | 2008-01-19 14:00:34 | TSearch: CLUSTER using GIST, query using GIN? |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2008-01-19 08:17:21 | Re: WARNINGs after starting backup server created with PITR |