Re: FW: Re: FW: Re: Shouldn;t this trigger be called?

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: stan <stanb(at)panix(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FW: Re: FW: Re: Shouldn;t this trigger be called?
Date: 2019-09-16 04:16:35
Message-ID: 11b4428d-8740-07f4-a053-37f0bb0cd2fb@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 9/15/19 6:04 PM, stan wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 12:27:14PM -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>> On 9/15/19 10:46 AM, stan wrote:
>>> Forgot to cc the list again. Have to look at settings in mutt.
>>>
>>>>>>

>> What validity check?
>>
>
> The check to see if it is the type enum.
>

This would get solved a lot quicker if full information was provided:

1) Schema of the table.
Including associated triggers

2) The actual check code.

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Achilleas Mantzios 2019-09-16 10:06:09 Re: pgbouncer with ldap
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-09-16 04:12:34 Re: FW: Re: FW: Re: Shouldn;t this trigger be called?