From: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | AW: Re: Outstanding patches |
Date: | 2001-05-09 07:42:05 |
Message-ID: | 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA6879633682BC@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> We need to discuss whether we like the %TYPE feature proposed by Ian
> OK, one idea is to throw a elog(NOTICE) when they use this feature,
> stating that it will not track column changes. Another option is to
> just forget about the feature entirely. Do we have people
> who like this feature? Speak up now. If not, we will drop it.
I say drop it. (Never used it in Informix eighter, even though we have some heavy
stored procedure writers). In Informix the varlen is also not part of the signature,
it only states the longest accepted value.
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB | 2001-05-09 07:51:01 | AW: MULTIBYTE and SQL_ASCII (was Re: [JDBC] Re: A bug w ith pgsql 7.1/jdbc and non-ascii (8-bit) chars?) |
Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB | 2001-05-09 07:20:28 | AW: NOCREATETABLE patch (was: Re: Please, help!(about P ostgres)) |