AW: Re: Outstanding patches

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: AW: Re: Outstanding patches
Date: 2001-05-09 07:42:05
Message-ID: 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA6879633682BC@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>> We need to discuss whether we like the %TYPE feature proposed by Ian

> OK, one idea is to throw a elog(NOTICE) when they use this feature,
> stating that it will not track column changes. Another option is to
> just forget about the feature entirely. Do we have people
> who like this feature? Speak up now. If not, we will drop it.

I say drop it. (Never used it in Informix eighter, even though we have some heavy
stored procedure writers). In Informix the varlen is also not part of the signature,
it only states the longest accepted value.

Andreas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2001-05-09 07:51:01 AW: MULTIBYTE and SQL_ASCII (was Re: [JDBC] Re: A bug w ith pgsql 7.1/jdbc and non-ascii (8-bit) chars?)
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2001-05-09 07:20:28 AW: NOCREATETABLE patch (was: Re: Please, help!(about P ostgres))