| From: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Mikheev, Vadim'" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | AW: RE: xlog loose ends, continued |
| Date: | 2001-03-14 07:57:10 |
| Message-ID: | 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA68796336824A@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > > It will be sufficient if DB will not use all 2^32 XIDs
> > > without shutdown.
> >
> > I liked the xid wraparound idea, won't that be sufficient here too ?
> > I don't like the idea to reuse a xid sooner than absolutely necessary.
>
> We need it to reduce pg_log size requirements.
Yes, I know, that this would simplify pg_log size reduction, but imho we should
try hard to find other ways to reduce pg_log size.
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB | 2001-03-14 08:08:50 | AW: Shutdown term |
| Previous Message | Andrew McMillan | 2001-03-14 05:13:35 | Re: Re: xlog loose ends, continued |