| From: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Peter Eisentraut'" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) |
| Date: | 2001-01-22 16:28:49 |
| Message-ID: | 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA6879633681D1@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Is anyone looking at doing this? Is this purely a MySQL-ism, or is it
> > something that everyone else has except us?
>
> It's not required by SQL, that's for sure. I think in 7.2 we'll tackle
> schema support, which will accomplish the same thing.
It does not (e.g. remote access).
> Many people
> (including myself) are of the opinion that not allowing cross-db access is
> in fact a feature.
Can you tell me what that "feature" gains you other than mere inconvenience ?
And are you implying, that all the other db's are misfeatured in this regard?
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-22 16:30:49 | Re: FW: Postgresql on win32 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-22 16:27:03 | Re: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) |