From: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Pete Forman <pete(dot)forman(at)westerngeco(dot)com>, lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX |
Date: | 2001-01-12 16:07:26 |
Message-ID: | 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA6879633681B2@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Yes, the annoyance is, that localtime works for dates before 1970
> > but mktime doesn't. Best would probably be to assume no DST before
> > 1970 on AIX and IRIX.
>
> That seems like a reasonable answer to me, especially since we have
> other platforms that behave that way. How can we do this --- just
> test for isdst = -1 after the call, and assume that means failure?
Since we have tests of the form (tm_isdst > 0) ? ... in other parts of the code
this would imho be sufficient.
BTW, I would use the above check for DST in all parts of the code.
Currently we eighter have (tm_isdst ? ....) or the above form.
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-01-12 16:13:46 | Re: Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2001-01-12 16:05:25 | Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! |