AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Oleg Bartunov'" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!
Date: 2001-01-11 10:25:25
Message-ID: 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA6879633681A6@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> > > we've almost totally rewrite gist.c because old code and algorithm
> > > were not suitable for variable size keys. I think it might be
> > > submitted into 7.1 beta source tree.
> >
> > Urgh. Dropping in a total rewrite when we're already past
> beta3 doesn't
> > strike me as good project management practice --- especially if the
> > rewrite was done to add features (ie variable-size keys) not merely
> > fix bugs. I think it might be more prudent to hold this for 7.2.
>
> OK. If our changes will not go to 7.1, is't possible to create
> feature archive and announce it somewhere. It would be nice if
> people could test it. Anyway, I'll create web page with all
> docs and patches. I'm afraid one more year to 7.2 is enough for
> GiST to die :-)

I think featureism is the the most prominent argument for PostgreSQL.
Thus standing before a decision to eighter fix GiST bugs and risc a new
bug (limited to GiST) because of an added feature or shipping a known
broken GiST, my vote would definitely be to add Oleg's patch.

Andreas

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2001-01-11 10:54:06 Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2001-01-11 10:09:19 Re: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!