From: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "'lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org'" <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
Cc: | "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX |
Date: | 2001-01-09 16:44:04 |
Message-ID: | 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA6879633681A0@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > On AIX timestamp and horology regression fails in current, because
> > timestamp - interval for result timestamps that are before
> 1970 (epoch ?)
> > are off by one hour. I think this is not an issue for an
> adapted expected file,
> > but a new (in 7.1beta) bug. But I am at no means an expert
> at what the result
> > should be when substracting 34 years from epoch or 'Mon Dec
> 30 17:32:01 1996 PST'.
>
> Hi Andreas. It is certainly true that the behavior has changed for the
> new release, but afaik it can not be put into the "bug" category.
>
> The difference is that, before, I rotated date/time into the correct
> time zone for arithmetic by adding/subtracting the current time zone.
> For (date/time)-(interval), this resulted in evaluating the result in
> the same time zone as the starting date/time, which was not correct.
>
> The time zone is now evaluated in the time zone of the result, rather
> than the input, using system support routines from libc. But that will
> expose troubles on some platforms with time zone support before 1970.
> Some platforms are worse than others; my experience has been that
> zinc-based systems such as Linux, FreeBSD, and Tru64 are pretty good,
> Suns are the best, and, well, apparently AIX is not ;)
What I do not understand is, that I thought a time in december cannot be
affected by such math because it is clearly not in the daylight savings
months of the year ? Also I thought that you recognize daylight savings time
by the PDT instead of PST, and PostgreSQL shows a result with PST as I
would have expected, but one hour off.
e.g.: Mon Dec 30 17:32:01 1996 PST - @ 34 years --> Sun Dec 30 16:32:01 1962 PST
How do we go about resolving this ? I hesitate to mark a bogus result
"ok".
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-01-09 17:05:34 | Re: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-01-09 16:21:33 | Re: README.mb |