AW: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inhe rited from template1

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Philip Warner'" <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: AW: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inhe rited from template1
Date: 2000-11-09 16:16:20
Message-ID: 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA687963368103@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> I agree; it's a pain that one DB misbehaving kills an entire installation.

If that is of concern you need separate postmasters, no way around that,
and imho not a problem at all.

Andreas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pete Forman 2000-11-09 16:17:20 Re: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2000-11-09 16:10:02 AW: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inhe rited from template1