From: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | AW: How Do You Pronounce "PostgreSQL"? |
Date: | 2000-08-24 08:55:11 |
Message-ID: | 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA68796336805C@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> In my personal experience, out in the real world, people refer to it as
> "Postgres". The QL being a mouthful, and contrary to the common practice
> of pronouncing SQL as SEQUEL. While Marc points out that technically
> Postgres died when it left Berkeley, that discontinuity is really only
> something we choose to acknowledge. As Henry points out, SQL
> is only one
> feature that happened to be added. Apart from not owning the domain
> name, why shouldn't it just be "Postgres"?
Everybody I know also still sais "Postgres", leaving out the Q L
becaus it is too long. In german we would not have the "sequel" problem,
since we pronounce it "ess ku ell". I think they all know that they are
really
referring to PostgreSQL.
Guess what you find under www.postgres.com ? Yes, it is Great Bridge.
postgresql.com is taken by some Korean domain grabber.
BTW Marc, I would make www.postgres.org point to postgresql.
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jules Bean | 2000-08-24 09:11:14 | Re: Optimisation deficiency: currval('seq')-->seq scan, constant-->index scan |
Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB | 2000-08-24 08:29:50 | AW: Re: How Do You Pronounce "PostgreSQL"? |