From: | Marc Munro <marc(at)bloodnok(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: function body actors (was: [PERFORM] viewing source code) |
Date: | 2007-12-22 00:28:12 |
Message-ID: | 1198283292.27962.5.camel@bloodnok.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2007-21-12 at 18:05 -0400, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
wrote:
> > > 2. Protect the content of a field from _some_ users on a given
> system,
> >
> > I would argue that (2) is reasonably well served today by setting up
> > separate databases for separate users.
>
> I thought actually this was one of the use-cases we were hearing.
> Different people using the same database (because the same data), with
> rules about the different staff being able to see this or that
> function body. I can easily imagine such a case, for instance, in a
> large organization with different departments and different
> responsibilities. It seems a shame that the only answer we have there
> is, "Give them different databases."
There is also Veil:
http://veil.projects.postgresql.org/curdocs/index.html
__
Marc
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-12-22 02:50:08 | Re: New style of hash join proposal |
Previous Message | Decibel! | 2007-12-21 23:13:54 | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for Null Bitmap Optimization(for TrailingNULLs) |