Re: Numeric 508 datatype

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Date: 2005-12-03 18:07:34
Message-ID: 1198.1133633254@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> (I could have done the struct but that seemed too invasive.)

I think it'd be a lot cleaner with the struct. Mind if I take another
pass at it?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message alex.cotarlan 2005-12-03 18:34:19 8.03 versus 8.04
Previous Message Steve Atkins 2005-12-03 17:43:42 Re: PostgresSQL Halting System Boot

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2005-12-03 19:01:02 Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-12-03 17:53:44 Re: Reducing relation locking overhead

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nicolai Tufar 2005-12-03 19:26:45 Re: [HACKERS] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows in 8.1
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2005-12-03 17:38:53 Re: [HACKERS] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows in 8.1