| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: [PATCHES] archiver ps display] |
| Date: | 2007-12-13 15:12:31 |
| Message-ID: | 1197558751.4255.1812.camel@ebony.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 15:58 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007 schrieb Simon Riggs:
> > Now that we have set archiver messages to DEBUG levels, there's no easy
> > way of seeing what file we are currently working on.
>
> > After archive_command
> > postgres: archiver process archived 00000001000000000000000B
>
> ps isn't a very robust and portable way to monitor something so important.
> Anything that is interesting should also be visible in some other, more
> well-defined way, such as an SQL function or table.
Yeh, agreed, there are external ways of checking what's going on.
I really meant for people to eyeball it. Since we do it for recovery, it
seems sensible to do the same thing for archiving.
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Markus Schiltknecht | 2007-12-13 15:21:04 | Re: VLDB Features |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-12-13 14:58:25 | Re: [Fwd: [PATCHES] archiver ps display] |