| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, emilioplatzer(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Documentation for create unique index is insuficient and (because of that) incorrect |
| Date: | 2018-11-20 15:16:42 |
| Message-ID: | 11974.1542727002@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
"Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> On 11/20/18 9:59 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yes. That was a dumb idea; the correct fix is to take that out, because
>> it's not appropriate here. There might be room for an additional section
>> later in the chapter that discusses INCLUDE, but we shouldn't be
>> cluttering the discussion of fundamental concepts like unique indexes
>> with that.
> Shows how closely I read the docs. +1 on removing INCLUDE from UNIQUE
> indexes.
>
> Also +1 on having a section on covering indexes.
I see Alvaro is on the same page here. I'll go write something
later today.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-11-20 17:57:45 | Re: Documentation for create unique index is insuficient and (because of that) incorrect |
| Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2018-11-20 15:02:01 | Re: Documentation for create unique index is insuficient and (because of that) incorrect |